Google’s preparation Problem: Ads sustained in spitefulness of warning

Google might contain nonstop to serve ads for banned drug companies level after being warn by some groups that the ads and the online pharmacies they promote despoiled the act.

If the company did intentionally allow criminally in service companies to use its promotion stage, it might have to pay the division of impartiality up to $500 million, one of the biggest sums ever salaried to the government in a business dispute.

In the DOJ’s analysis, officials are trying to decide whether Google worked with advertisers who be promote against the law behavior, such as advertising forbidden pharmaceuticals to U.S. citizens from pharmacies working in Canada and other countries.

Now, according to proof that has been review by the Wall Street Journal, “state regulator and business watchdogs” may have frequently alert Google to the banned movement. These warning had been coming to Google since at least 2003 and intensify in 2008, when ads from banned online pharmacies appear in Google ads even after the company in progress using a moderator confirmation system.

Just a few months ago, Google announced it was suing online pharmacy advertisers for breaking the search engine’s terms of service and violate U.S. central laws by using the Google ad system to put on the market prescription medication without a instruction. However, specified the timing, this statement may have basically been a face-saving reaction to DOJ probes.

We’ll carry on to go after this case. Do you believe Google was blameless in these matters, the injured party of against the law advertisers who were target on gaming the system? Or could the web giant have been complicit, collecting cost and spinning a sightless eye to its advertisers’ behavior?