After Danvers Baillieu, chief counsel and associate specialists Pinsent Masons media, tweets information they know to be protected against any form of order for contempt. ; If the information, including the arrest and transfer of knowledge - in this tweet - you're invited to the problems, he said. , Refers to a Re-Tweet about how they are re-published information is true and there is no defense to say that you are not the first person to break the rules.
But she said that Baillieu pragmatism prevails in these situations, as thousands of people, or tweet tweet again or proprietary information in recent weeks. He said there was no way the authorities desire to take a position in relation to Twitter users. He warned that those responsible for rumors about Jemima Khan, the contract is not a super hit, who can be prosecuted for insulting his face. Other risks tweeter other stars who have been indicted by the order of great contempt. Lord Baillieu said that Twitter can defend the fact that American companies, and therefore not covered by European legislation.
It can also be argued that its users are responsible for your tweets, and not companies. Also, Twitter Baillieu said the defense because of the freedom of expression, according to the U.S. in the First Amendment. Twitter had no comment today. He admitted that the super-order is becoming increasingly difficult to implement successfully in the digital age, but may still have some influence. You can always do with success, unless in cases where a low profile. But if [PT], the situation like Iran, where block all Internet domains, we can not allow thousands of people to publish what they want online all the time. ;
Robin Shaw, defamation and privacy advocates to Davenport Lyons, said today the news that Twitter user details of the private life of the star must have been hidden for anonymity Super someone or contract demonstrates how to use the Internet to use these kinds of decisions are not can be assured their members last stop of the public to understand what to do with knowledge, gagged reached. ;
But she said that Baillieu pragmatism prevails in these situations, as thousands of people, or tweet tweet again or proprietary information in recent weeks. He said there was no way the authorities desire to take a position in relation to Twitter users. He warned that those responsible for rumors about Jemima Khan, the contract is not a super hit, who can be prosecuted for insulting his face. Other risks tweeter other stars who have been indicted by the order of great contempt. Lord Baillieu said that Twitter can defend the fact that American companies, and therefore not covered by European legislation.
It can also be argued that its users are responsible for your tweets, and not companies. Also, Twitter Baillieu said the defense because of the freedom of expression, according to the U.S. in the First Amendment. Twitter had no comment today. He admitted that the super-order is becoming increasingly difficult to implement successfully in the digital age, but may still have some influence. You can always do with success, unless in cases where a low profile. But if [PT], the situation like Iran, where block all Internet domains, we can not allow thousands of people to publish what they want online all the time. ;
Robin Shaw, defamation and privacy advocates to Davenport Lyons, said today the news that Twitter user details of the private life of the star must have been hidden for anonymity Super someone or contract demonstrates how to use the Internet to use these kinds of decisions are not can be assured their members last stop of the public to understand what to do with knowledge, gagged reached. ;
No comments:
Post a Comment